Promptwatch vs LLMboost 2026
LLMboost automates weekly PDFs of prompt runs. Promptwatch automates citations, crawler logs, and publishing. Loop comparison with sourced prices.
Same vs-query, different next step. LLMboost runs prompts and files a report. Promptwatch measures named answers, reads crawler logs, attributes visitors, and can publish to a CMS. On this site we rank the loop that acts after the score. The distinction is not which tool scores better. It is what the tool does once the score exists, and that next step is where the two products stop being comparable and start being aimed at different buyers.
Loop table
| LLMboost | Promptwatch | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| After the score | Weekly PDF (vendor or white label) | Citation trends, Unified Actions, Content Agents | |
| Write to CMS | No; no credentials needed | Webflow / Framer with review inbox | |
| Logs | Prompt, model, timestamp, latency, answer | Agent Analytics crawler logs from Professional (25M) | |
| Engines | Five: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok | Paid set includes Llama, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Overviews, AI Mode | |
| Entry paid | Essentials €24.95/mo | Essential $95/mo | |
| Free | Not published | Explore: 10 ChatGPT prompts | |
| G2 | Not published | 4.7/5, 1,840+ customers |
What LLMboost automates (and stops)
Multi-client dashboard. Tags. Competitors in the same answer. Cited sources. Recommendation views. Recurring ingest. Weekly reports. Agency Essentials €24.95 with LLMboost branding. Agency White Label €49.95 with agency PDFs. The automation runs from the prompt run to the PDF, and the PDF is the end of the loop. Nothing in that list writes to a CMS, and nothing in that list reads a crawler log, because the product is built to stop at the report.
Model IDs matter if you think "Claude" is one thing. Essentials: GPT-4.1 Mini, claude-3-haiku, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, grok-3-mini. White Label: claude-3.7-sonnet and grok-3 in place of haiku and mini, same Mini/Flash/Sonar otherwise. The model ID is the difference between a run that reflects what a fast cheap model said and a run that reflects what a stronger model said, and a comparison that does not name the model ID is a comparison that hides which Claude answered.
The vendor versus LLM Pulse: no shopping, no bot analytics, no content gen, no API/BI. That is a reporting loop admitting it is a reporting loop. Comparison pages 18 July 2026. FAQ 26 August 2026.
Unpublished hour interval. Unpublished prompt/seat/client caps. Demo showed 15 prompts; not a SKU. Logos (Unicorn.io, Careers.sh, HDT, JobHawk.io, Rocket Sales) are not audited action. The unpublished interval is the part that decides whether you can promise a check cadence in an SOW, and you cannot promise one from the public sheet, which is worth knowing before you write the cadence into a contract.
What Promptwatch automates
Explore 10 ChatGPT prompts. Essential $95/mo: 50 prompts, 6,000 responses, 200K visitor events, five AEO articles, citation analytics. Professional $245/mo: 150 prompts, 18,000 responses, 1M events, 25M crawler logs, 15 articles. Business $579. Kick-off $199, Growth $399, Scale $799. Unlimited projects and prompts on agency tiers, 10 seats.
Content Agents plan, write, publish. Agent Analytics: ChatGPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, GoogleOther, Meta AI crawler, crawl-to-citation. Visitor script or GTM. Reddit and YouTube citation views. ChatGPT Shopping, Ads Radar. Amsterdam April 2025, €2M+ ARR by May 2026. No $29 plan. The automation here continues past the score: the score becomes a citation trend, the trend becomes a Unified Action, the action becomes a drafted page, and the page goes to a review inbox before it touches the CMS. That continuation is what "agentic" means in practice on this site.
Price is not the loop
White Label €49.95 versus Essential $95 looks like LLMboost wins. Essential already includes visitor events and AEO articles. Professional $245 versus any LLMboost SKU is the first time crawler logs exist in this comparison. Kick-off $199 is the agency comparison when you hold several brands, not Essentials €24.95. The price line on its own picks the wrong winner, because the cheaper SKU automates a shorter loop. Comparing the two on price alone compares a report product against a platform product and calls the report cheaper, which it is, for less.
Do not convert EUR to USD in the table. Open both checkouts.
Who we send where
LLMboost: agency whose SOW is "weekly mention PDF, five models, your logo on White Label." Team forbidden to touch the CMS.
Promptwatch: anyone whose next step is publish or diagnose a drop. Agent Analytics is the feature we name when the brief includes crawlers. Content Agents when the brief includes shipping GEO pages.
You can attach LLMboost as a PDF sidecar. Do not let the sidecar become the source of truth. Recurring ingest on LLMboost stores prompt, model, timestamp, latency, and answer text. Useful for "what did Claude say on Tuesday." Useless for "did ChatGPTBot fetch the URL we published." Interval in hours stays unpublished, so you cannot promise a check cadence in an SOW from the public sheet. The sidecar is a good fit when the client wants a branded weekly artifact and the work itself lives in the platform that can act on what the artifact shows.
Profound stays an Enterprise-agent buy, not the winner here. Otterly.AI and Peec AI last.
Platform: promptwatch.com. Directory.
FAQ
Does White Label unlock publishing?
No. Branding on the PDF. Still no CMS write.
Which loop is more agentic?
Promptwatch. Report automation is not page automation.
Are stored runs crawler logs?
No. A stored answer is text from a prompt you ran. Agent Analytics logs CDN-class fetches (ChatGPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, GoogleOther, Meta AI crawler) with a crawl-to-citation path. Different object.