Promptwatch vs Okara vs Seology vs Rankverse (2026)
Three agentic SEO tools that ship fixes as pull requests, compared with Promptwatch, the platform that measures AI visibility and publishes GEO content.
Okara, Seology, and Rankverse all promise the same thing: an agent that audits your site and then opens pull requests to fix it. That is a real step past the dashboards that hand you a list of problems and leave. The people shortlisting these three tend to be developers or technical marketers who own a repo, who want schema, canonicals, and llms.txt handled on a schedule, and who have started hearing questions from leadership about ChatGPT and Perplexity.
The catch is that a fixed site is not the same as a cited site. Shipping a schema PR tells you nothing about whether ChatGPT now recommends you, which pages the AI crawlers actually read, or whether anyone arrived from an AI answer and bought something. So we put Promptwatch in the line-up, because it covers the half of the loop the repo agents leave open.
We score every tool on four steps. Monitor: does it track what AI engines say about you? Diagnose: can it tell you why? Act: does it change the site or publish content? Verify: can it prove the change worked? All pricing and features for Okara, Seology, and Rankverse come from their entries in our directory. If an entry does not publish something, we say so.
Promptwatch
Promptwatch is an AI search visibility platform, and it is the only tool here that is built around all four steps rather than the act step alone.
Monitoring runs on prompt tracking across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Llama, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, and Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, read from the real interfaces rather than only APIs. Prompts carry search volumes, difficulty scores, and query fan-outs, and every paid brand plan refreshes them daily. Diagnosis is where it pulls away from the others. Citation analytics shows which pages, domains, Reddit threads, and YouTube videos the engines cite, and citation trends show how those sources move over time. Agent Analytics logs AI crawler hits from ChatGPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, GoogleOther, and the Meta AI crawler, with a crawl-to-citation path and error tracking.
The act step is Content Agents. They plan from a content gap analysis, write, and publish to Webflow, Framer, or WordPress (through an official plugin), with a review inbox in front of anything going live. One Framer note: publishing there redeploys the whole Framer site, not just the new item. Verification comes from visitor analytics, a lightweight script or GTM template that ties AI-referred sessions to conversions.
Pricing: Explore is free with 10 prompts on ChatGPT. Essential is $95 a month with a 7-day trial, 50 prompts, and 5 AEO articles, but no crawler logs. Professional at $245 a month adds 25 million crawler logs, 150 prompts, and 15 articles. Business is $579 a month.
Okara
Okara sells itself as an AI CMO, a set of agents covering SEO, GEO, writing, Reddit, LinkedIn, X, UGC, influencers, and code. The part that matters for this comparison is the Coding Agent. It writes JSON-LD schema, llms.txt, canonicals, meta descriptions, and head tags as real code, and every batch lands as one GitHub pull request with a plain-English explanation and a diff. PRs arrive daily from the latest audit, and nothing merges until you approve it. Rollback is a git revert.
On the GEO side, the listing covers llms.txt, FAQ schema, and AI-readable content structure aimed at ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. The catalog lists integrations with WordPress, Webflow, Framer, Wix, Sanity, Search Console, Google Analytics, and GitHub, but it does not document a publishing loop that pushes GEO articles to Webflow or Framer.
The free AI CMO plan covers analysis and strategy only. The Coding Agent starts on AI CMO Lite at $129 a month ($108 annual), which also includes at least 30 articles a month and 15 tracked AI search prompts. AI CMO Pro is $249 a month ($208 annual) and unlocks every agent. Fifteen prompts is a thin monitor step, and the listing does not publish crawler logs, citation analytics, or visitor conversions.
Seology
Seology is the most disciplined of the three about what an agent should touch. It runs more than 200 checks across technical SEO, on-page, structured data, Core Web Vitals, indexation, and GEO visibility for ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini. Each issue goes into one of two buckets. Deterministic fixes like meta tags, canonicals, alt text, schema, redirect chains, robots directives, Open Graph, and hreflang ship as pull requests. Judgment calls like content gaps, internal linking, and E-E-A-T get flagged with a recommendation instead.
You choose how much rope to give it. Monitor mode audits and alerts. Co-pilot proposes and waits. Autopilot opens PRs on its own, which works only if someone on your team actually reviews them. It supports Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, Wix, Squarespace, and custom sites through Magic.js.
Starter is free for one site with weekly scans and 50 auto-fixes a month. Pro is $49 a month for five sites, daily scans, unlimited fixes, GEO optimization, and API access, with a free trial. Enterprise is custom. The listing does not publish AI crawler logs, citation analytics, visitor conversions, or a CMS publishing path for GEO articles.
Rankverse
Rankverse calls its approach RankOps: detect, fix, publish, distribute, and measure as one loop. One crawl produces four scores per page (SEO, AEO, GEO, and AI Visibility), ranked by traffic impact. It crawls up to 50,000 pages in under five minutes and re-crawls after every deploy. Fixes ship as pull requests on GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket and revert if rankings drop. Of the three repo agents, that is the closest thing to a built-in verify step.
Rankverse also publishes, which Okara and Seology do not document. The targets are WordPress, Medium, Dev.to, Hashnode, Ghost, and Blogger, with canonical tags set. Those are mostly blog and syndication platforms rather than a CMS publishing loop. Its AI Visibility tracker runs real prompts on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini and scores position, citation, and recommendation quality.
Pricing starts at INR 3,999 a month (the homepage shows INR as of April 2026), with a 14-day free trial and no card required. Scale adds five seats and white-label reports, but its price is not published. Enterprise is contact-led. The listing does not publish AI crawler logs or visitor conversion analytics.
Side by side
| Promptwatch | Okara | Seology | Rankverse | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | AI visibility platform | Agentic SEO automation | Agentic SEO automation | Agentic SEO automation |
| Entry price | Free Explore; Essential $95/mo | Free (analysis only); Lite $129/mo | Free Starter; Pro $49/mo | From INR 3,999/mo |
| Trial | 7 days on Essential | Not published | Free trial on Pro | 14 days, no card |
| Monitor | Daily prompt tracking on paid plans, 9 LLMs plus AI Overviews and AI Mode | 15 AI search prompts on Lite | GEO checks for ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini | AI Visibility prompts on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini |
| Diagnose | Citation analytics, Agent Analytics crawler logs (Professional and up) | Audit feeding daily PRs | 200+ checks, auto-fixable vs flagged | Four scores per page by traffic impact |
| Act | Content Agents publish to WordPress, Webflow, Framer with review inbox | Coding Agent PRs; 30+ articles/mo on paid plans | Fix PRs in Monitor, Co-pilot, or Autopilot mode | Fix PRs; publish to WordPress, Medium, Ghost and others |
| Verify | Visitor analytics with conversions; prompt and citation trends | Not published | Not published | Re-crawl after deploy; revert if rankings drop |
| AI crawler logs | Yes, from Professional | Not published | Not published | Not published |
Who should pick which
If your site has a backlog of broken schema, missing canonicals, and no llms.txt, and you want that cleared without filing tickets, any of the three repo agents will help. Seology is the cheapest way in and the most careful about separating safe fixes from judgment calls. Okara makes sense if you also want its social and content agents and can live with a small prompt allowance. Rankverse suits teams that want fixes, blog syndication, and a rankings-based rollback in one place, as long as INR billing works for your finance team.
None of the three answers the question your CMO will eventually ask: did the fix get us cited, and did that citation drive revenue? For that you need the diagnose and verify steps, which is where Promptwatch sits. Plenty of teams will run both: a repo agent to keep the code clean, and Promptwatch to decide what to publish next and prove what worked.
Our recommendation
If you can only trial one tool, trial Promptwatch. The repo agents are good at the act step, but they act blind. Promptwatch's Agent Analytics shows whether ChatGPTBot or PerplexityBot even reached the page you fixed, and citation analytics shows which sources the engines cite instead of you. Content Agents write and publish the missing pages through a review inbox, and visitor analytics ties the resulting AI-referred visits to conversions. Start on Professional at $245 a month so the crawler logs are included, or use the free Explore tier to see your baseline first. You can sign up at Promptwatch. Add a repo agent later if your technical backlog is the bottleneck.